1. Introduction to GSM Network
GSM System Architecture
GSM Bandwidth
GSM 900 and GSM 1800 are twins
GSM 900 GSM 1800
Frequency band 890...960 MHz 1710...1880 MHz
Number of channels 124 372
Channel spacing 200 kHz 200 kHz
Access technique TDMA TDMA
Mobile power 0,8 / 2 / 5 W 0,25 / 1 W
There are no major differences between GSM 900 and GSM 1800
GSM 900 :
GSM 1800 :
Logical Channels
Same in GSM900 and GSM1800
Downlink Channels
Common Channels
Dedicated Channels
Up-link Channels
Common Channels
Dedicated Channels
Use of Logical Channels
---> FCCH : Search for Frequency Correction Burst
---> SCH :Search for Synchronisation sequence---> BCCH : Read System Informations
---> PCH: Listen for Paging
---> RACH: Send Access burst
---> AGCH: Wait for signalling channel allocation
---> SDCCH: Call setup
---> FACCH: Traffic channel is assigned
---> TCH: Conversation
---> FACCH: Call release
Mapping of Logical Channels
.Logical channels are mapped to physical channels
Signalling : sequences of 51 frames
Traffic : sequences of 26 frames
The Mobile Radio Link
Radio Wave Propagation
The theory of wave propagation is an exact science
Mobile Telecommunications
What is special about Mobile Communications ?
-Multi-path propagation
radio path is a miserable propagation medium
-Limited transmit energy
transmitting power of mobiles determines service range
battery life-time
-Limited spectrum
sets upper limit for data rates (Shannon´s theorem)
additional effort needed for channel coding
frequencies need to be re-used ==> self- interference
-Many mobile users
Radio Channel
Multipath propagation
Shadowing
Terrain structures
Reflections
Interference
Reflections
Strong echoes can cause excessive propagation delay
uncritical, if within equalizer window
can cause severe (self-) interference if out of equalizer window
Fading(1)
Slow fading(Lognormal Fading)
shadowing due to large obstacles on the way
Fast fading (Rayleigh fading)
destructive interference of several signals
“fading dips”, “radio holes”
Fading(2)
Signal Variations
Propagation
Free- space propagation
signal strength decreases exponentially with distance
Reflection
heavy amplitude attenuation
material dependent phase shifts depolarization
Diffraction
wedge- model
knife edge
multiple knife edges
morpho : additional attenuation due
to land usage classes
with
f: frequency in MHz
h: BS antenna height [m]
a(h): function of MS antenna height
d: distance between BS and MS [km]
and
A= 69.55, B = 26.16 (for 150 .. 1000 MHz)
A= 46.3 , B = 33.9 (for 1000 ..2000MHz)
Land Usage Types
Urban: small cells, 40..50 dB/dec attenuation
Forest: heavy absorption; 30..40 dB/dec;
differs with season (foliage losses)
Open, farmlands: easy, smooth propagation conditions
Water: signal propagates very easily ==> dangerous !
Mountain faces: strong reflections, long echoes
Glaciers: very strong reflections; extreme delays
strong interference over long distance
Hilltops: can be used as barriers between cells
do NOT use as antenna sites locations
Antenna Characteristics
Lobes
main lobes
side / back lobes
front-to-back ratio
Halfpower beam-width (3 dB- beam width)
Antenna downtilting
Polarization
Antenna bandwidth
Antenna impedance
Mechanical size
windload
Installation Examples
Antenna (down-) tilting
improve spot coverage
reduce interference
Strong echoes can cause excessive propagation delay
uncritical, if within equalizer window
can cause severe (self-) interference if out of equalizer window
Fading(1)
Slow fading(Lognormal Fading)
shadowing due to large obstacles on the way
Fast fading (Rayleigh fading)
destructive interference of several signals
“fading dips”, “radio holes”
Fading(2)
Signal Variations
Propagation
Free- space propagation
signal strength decreases exponentially with distance
Reflection
specular R.
amplitude: A --> α*A (α < 1)
phase : 0 --> - 0
polarization: material dependent phase shift
Diffuse R.
amplitude: A --> α*A (α << 1)
phase : 0 --> random phase
polarization : random
Absorption
heavy amplitude attenuation
material dependent phase shifts depolarization
Diffraction
wedge- model
knife edge
multiple knife edges
Propagation Model
Historical CCIR- Model for radio/ TV-stations
not very accurate nor serious
Okumura- Hata
empirical model
measured and estimated additional attenuations
estimations for larger distances (range: 5 .. 20km)
don´t use for small distances ( < 1km)
Hata’s Model
Adapted for 900 MHz, Europe, different land usage classes
morpho : additional attenuation due
to land usage classes
with
f: frequency in MHz
h: BS antenna height [m]
a(h): function of MS antenna height
d: distance between BS and MS [km]
and
A= 69.55, B = 26.16 (for 150 .. 1000 MHz)
A= 46.3 , B = 33.9 (for 1000 ..2000MHz)
Land Usage Types
Urban: small cells, 40..50 dB/dec attenuation
Forest: heavy absorption; 30..40 dB/dec;
differs with season (foliage losses)
Open, farmlands: easy, smooth propagation conditions
Water: signal propagates very easily ==> dangerous !
Mountain faces: strong reflections, long echoes
Glaciers: very strong reflections; extreme delays
strong interference over long distance
Hilltops: can be used as barriers between cells
do NOT use as antenna sites locations
Walfish- Ikegami Model
Model for urban microcellular propagation
Assumes regular city layout (“Manhattan grid”)
Total path loss consists of three parts:
line-of-sight loss LLOS
roof-to-street loss LRTS
mobile environment losses LMS
Antenna Characteristics
Lobes
main lobes
side / back lobes
front-to-back ratio
Halfpower beam-width (3 dB- beam width)
Antenna downtilting
Polarization
Antenna bandwidth
Antenna impedance
Mechanical size
windload
Coupling Between Antennas
Horizontal separation
needs approx. 5λ
distance for sufficient decoupling
distance for sufficient decoupling
antenna patterns superimposed if distance too close
Vertical separation
distance of 1λ provides good
decoupling value
good for RX /TX decoupling
Minimum coupling loss
Installation Examples
omnidirectional.: 5 .. 20m
directional : 1 ... 3m
Recommended decoupling
TX - TX: ~20dB
TX - RX: ~40dB
Horizontal decoupling
distance depends on
Antenna gain
Horizontal rad. pattern
Omnidirectional antennas
RX + TX with vertical separation
RX, RX div. , TX with vertical separation (“fork”)
Vertical decoupling is much more effective
Directional antennas
sectorized sites
improve spot coverage
reduce interference
Telecom Community is best blog . very nice blog NPO network planning and optimization
ReplyDelete